271
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

Five-decade UK study finds that aggression at school leads to better-paying jobs, while those with emotional instability went on to earn less

Children who displayed aggressive behaviour at school, such as bullying or temper outbursts, are likely to earn more money in middle age, according to a five-decade study that upends the maxim that bullies do not prosper.

They are also more likely to have higher job satisfaction and be in more desirable jobs, say researchers from the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex.

The paper, published today, used data about almost 7,000 people born in 1970 whose lives have been tracked by the British Cohort Study. The research team examined data from primary school teachers who assessed the children’s social and emotional skills when they were 10 years old in 1980, and matched it to their lives at the age of 46 in 2016.

“We found that those children who teachers felt had problems with attention, peer relationships and emotional instability did end up earning less in the future, as we expected, but we were surprised to find a strong link between aggressive behaviour at school and higher earnings in later life,” said Prof Emilia Del Bono, one of the study’s authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What I'm gathering from this is I should become some sort of crazed vigilante, who goes and punches bullies in the face at playgrounds

And I completely disagree about handling adult bullies. It's quite straightforward. Just illegal.

Apparently punching children and assaulting adults with tire irons is "wrong" and "against the law"

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 8 months ago

Bullying bullies doesn't teach them that bullying isn't a path to power. It just teaches them that you're higher up in the chain than they are, for now.

Ohhh, punch them harder, got it.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I can understand putting a subjective word like "wrong" in air quotes, since that's a matter of judgement, not objectivity. But whether something is legal or illegal is usually pretty straightforward, and not subject to interpretation outside of a courtroom, and specifically by a judge or jury.

Average joe is not permitted to interpret the law however he thinks it ought to be interpreted, that would just be chaos.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
271 points (97.5% liked)

science

14595 readers
22 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS