775
Movie adaptations of your favorite IP
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
775 points (98.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5765 readers
491 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Adaptations are usually cash grabs because Hollywood is allergic to taking any risk or making anything that isn’t middle of the road, bland, mass appeal bollocks
“Lets take this unique ip, remove the unique bits and just have it be the same as every other shite movie we make”
They only want the name value and a guaranteed audience, sick of it. Make something new FFS.
Maybe I’ll get shit for this, but I really hate the whole “remake a movie but make the character black” purely because it’s lazy and makes it so you’re giving a black character a white story.
Take some fucking risk and make original black characters that actually represent real people and their heritage, rather than just wanting to remake a movie but mark off the black character checkbox. It’s a disservice.
I'm white af so I tend not to comment on stuff like this but I agree. It always makes me think, like wouldn't it be more productive to make a new character?
No, because that's risky, and lazy race/gender swaps allow them to play the "It's not a bad product, you're just racist/sexist" to both gaslight consumers, as well as explain to investors why they keep having massive critical and/or financial flops.
"It's not our fault (Large Studio Remake of a classic IP) lost millions of dollars, we made a great movie! It's the consumer base being bigoted! Please keep giving us money."
I was thinking this. I don't think other cultures even want media where it's an existing story but the races are swapped. They want original stories that connect to who they are and their experiences.
One of the best recent examples I can think of is Everything Everywhere All At Once. That movie was steeped in Chinese culture, not just a story in new york in a bland city block apartment with Chinese faces.
And it worked. The Chinese heritage and how it evolved into the American-Chinese hybrid that many first-generation Chinese families in the US live through was a central theme of the movie. The movie would not have been the same without it.
Isn't Marvel (or was it DC?) known for having it out for gingerheads? If character has ginger hair and white skin, there's mighty chance they'll switch to black actor in movie lol.
Speaking of gaslighting, anybody else really doubt the rotten tomato's audience score on "The Little Mermaid"? That shit is wack.
Hollywood: Let's make a movie based on a popular IP, so we can get some money from the folks who enjoy that popular IP.
Also Hollywood: Let's change popular IP to be like everything else we make.
Soon: J. J. Abrams presents: Battletech, starring Gal Godot as Greyson Carlyle.
And writing a proper and engaging story is not needed because the white-to-black change covered with a thick layer of CGI is good enough to justify the existence of the movie. A two week rush job to knock out a script should do it
I don't go to the cinema much anymore.