view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Oh shit -- yeah, you're 100% right on homelessness, I hadn't seen that. Mostly I look at sources that haven't been updated for 2023 yet. But yeah that's 100% accurate, I edited my comment.
So your railroad story is from December 2022 -- i.e. right after the strike broke, but before there had been time for the labor department to secure sick days for the workers, including at the exact union that guy's a member of.
Here's another story about it.
Here's another from early on, and then here's the update from June when 60% of workers had their sick leave.
Is that enough? Not really. I agree with Tormey's anger about how he's being treated, especially in December 2022 when the wounds would still have been fresh, and I'm sure on the whole balance he's still getting fucked. It's a goddamned shame. My point was more that Biden had the chance to break strikes on behalf of around 450,000 striking workers in 2023, and he didn't. Why do you think he didn't break any of those strikes?
I'm not doing any more homework for you, when your bad faith attempts at propaganda are that lazy.
Not clicking any more of your links and shit either dude. Have a nice day.
Ah yes, the famous propagandist's trick of saying "Oh hey you're right, let me edit my comment to reflect the new reality I just learned about." I see them do it all the time, it's a hallmark.
Quitting while you're ahead for the moment, instead of being willing to delve into any of the other issues surrounding the claims you were making, does seem pretty wise though. I'd probably do the same in your position. Have a good one.
Sorry I generally don't read you're replies, lol. I'm sure you can guess why.
Buh bye now.
From what I've seen I'm guessing it's because you only half understand the saying "it's better to close your mouth and be thought a fool than open it and remove all doubt".
You're absolutely pathetic. We're all laughing at your bullshit.
Internet bullying? What are you 12? Grow up lmao.
Are you intentionally framing your thoughts and opinions in the most insufferable way possible? If so, why?
It's like you could've made a decent point but then tried really hard to make it as disrespectfully as possible
You think I'm here to entertain you or something? If my points are good, take them. If not, fuck off.
That's the thing, we can't tell if they're good or not because of your poor communication skills and shitty attitude.
It's clearly a skill issue. lol
Me: genocide is bad
You: I can't tell what this guy is trying to communicate. What a shitty attitude. Lol
lol- digital equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and saying 'NANANANANA' ;)
Every time I interact with them it's a wall of text and links and it's all fluffy propaganda bullshit.
Sorry, but I'm just not into it.
Yeah- lot of people aren't into learning. I can see that about you.
So.. You just want to insult me or do you want to talk about Biden's record oil production or should I just report and move on?
Your pick. I'm just enjoying your clown show.
Okay then, I'm going to block you for trolling and following me through comment chains, byyyyeee.
If you don't want an audience don't put on a clown show ;)
What a little snowflake lmao
You already decided you don’t actually want to talk about the issues. Go take your feckless whining elsewhere.
Some call this supporting evidence and nuance. Complex issues don't always fit into catchy little zingers and glib sound-bites, as much as Fox News would like you to believe. One should not object to the length of a given piece of text, rather one should object to the contents. If you think what he said is a pile of crap, let's hear why.
Not if it's all bullshit.
If it's so plainly bullshit, you should have no trouble refuting it. Just asserting "it's bullshit" doesn't leave the readers any smarter.
I blocked them, I can't even see their comments anymore. Do your own homework 👍.
You can just say, “I don’t have any valid points to make, sorry bye” instead of this absolutely pathetic comment. Talk about bad faith…