231
submitted 8 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/music@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 48 points 8 months ago

They aren't. The fees are supposed to benefit the streaming companies.

I hope the bill discussed in the article helps rectify that.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

homie the only thing streaming benefits right now is music publishers, spotify and the artists are losing money like it's oil being produced during the industrialization.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The last update that I saw was that Spotify would be in the green if it didn't have to give severance pay to a large number of employees after mass layoffs, and also some real estate expenses that seem pretty unusual for a streaming service to have...? They should just ask Wisconsin to build them a place for free, those idiots will do anything for industry.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

they would be in the green if they didn't outsource music publishing, ironically.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
231 points (95.3% liked)

Music

8134 readers
71 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS