214

Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

No way! Little dictators exercising the power they have. But it is their platform, they can do what they want right?

This is probably the biggest threat to the fediverse.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 34 points 6 months ago

Threads is the biggest threat to the Fediverse.

[-] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago

Defederating from Meta won’t ruin it, it’ll protect it.

[-] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Bullying instance admins into aligning with your values is absolutely the type of behavior that will ruin this protocol.

Meta is evil and Threads is lame. And I can block them on my own, thank you.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Not linking to you on my personal website is bullying"

Give it a fucking break precious.

Co-ordinated action is needed to fight back against billion dollar companies, not leaving it up to individuals.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago

Cringey as fuck.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

They are not threatening the fediverst though are they? Just refusing to promote certain instances for newcomers. When I signed up, i wasn't really sure what I was signing up to but i did assume that not all instances were listed on that page that talked about them

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Create your own instance and become your own little benevolent dictator.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The above is the core strength of the fediverse. Tinpot despots may have an advantage in the network due to previous efforts, but they can be routed around any time they go nuts.

This is a huge, huge win over the top down shitbergs that is current corporate social media.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I think this is true, but the fediverse (as an entity) needs to prevent too much power accumulating at one point.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It ebbs and flows. Full decentralization would be ideal, but unrealistic. Power always consolidates, until it suddenly doesnt. Making it easy to leave when it "suddenly doesnt" is key.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I am not in favor of transitive property defederation either but Meta will make similar demands if they are allowed to be an influencer in the fedi as well. I’d rather that everyone just decides to defederate threads independently

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
214 points (95.7% liked)

Fediverse

28051 readers
307 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS