68
Is the GOP Gonna Break Down? (talkingpointsmemo.com)
submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

If Trump loses in November and continues to drain the GOP dry you will most likely get your wish, I can't see things going much further than this if they lose, although that would probably mean that it's time for the Democratic party to go back to being the conservative party again, while hopefully spawning something new that focuses on progression.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

There should be 4 parties.

Right wing nutjobs - MAGA
Center-Right - Republicans/Libertarians
Center-Left - Democrats
Progressives/Greens

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Or more, as long as there is a proper required number of votes why limit to 4 arbitrary parties. US has too little representatives anyway. A number should be set per number of inhabitants.

[-] astrsk@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

While a nice sentiment, we are organized social creatures by nature. It’s always going to end up in a small amount of larger groups and that’s just how it goes. No matter how well or bad a system works, the system is still made of people and we will congregate into specific roles and ideologies just as the very cells in our bodies group together to perform larger functions.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Sure, but I can imagine the US can have larger parties from separate states or some parties that represent a group of states. With the plurality of inhabitants, climates, environments the US just seems like it would be way better suited for a system with a plurality of parties. Representatives based on inhabitants.. I dunno one per 500k people or something. And STAR voting system per state instead of first past the pole.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Only if ranked choice voting.

The Nazis came to power with a minority voting support because there were a plurality of parties so they could have the most votes with only around a third of the country supporting their BS.

Ranked choice voting and multiple parties would be grand though

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Works for me, but the way the government is built is for the adversarial system, which means two main parties, that's why there's a public funding threshold based on the amount of voters for each party. It's because the founders felt that what basically amounts to political yin & yang will balance our government from getting too conservative or too progressive, it also goes along with Jefferson's "Tree of liberty" quote, where civil wars were planned for by the architects of our government, meaning that they were accepting of the idea that civil wars may occur often in our nation's history.

The easiest fix to our adversarial democracy problem is to either lower the public funding voter threshold, which would allow for more parties, or initiate national ranked choice voting, which would allow for better quality candidates while maintaining the adversarial system.

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

You could argue we already have those, but the 2 groups gets mixed with one. I don't know the words, but a parliamentary system?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I think the trouble with a parliamentary system is that it encourages things to splinter further and it ends up being MORE dysfunctional rather than less...

See...

https://youtu.be/WboggjN_G-4#t=26s

or:

https://youtu.be/l3fAcxcxoZ8?feature=shared

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago

The MAGA contingent is just way too big for this to happen. They would never support a more conservative Democratic Party.

But I wish it would happen.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

You mean admitting they're the conservative party. I've been calling the moderates "Republicrats" for years now. They are basically what Republicans were 40ish years ago.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah basically, because in our system there has to be a "conservative" party and a "progressive" party, and you're right, the old guard Republicans and Democrats that lean more conservative and more authoritative should team up and become the new non-batshit crazy conservative party, as the MAGA(GOP) party loses its legitimacy and slinks back into being the ostracized Far/Alt Right, as they should be.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
68 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
1963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS