600
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

In commemoration of the upcoming Transgender Day of Visibility (TDOV), President Joe Biden issued a statement praising trans people’s contributions to society and describing actions his administration has taken to counter transphobic bullying and extremism. Additionally, many members of Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also issued their own statements affirming that community health depends on supporting trans people too.

“Transgender Americans are part of the fabric of our Nation,” Biden wrote in his statement. “Whether serving their communities or in the military, raising families or running businesses, they help America thrive. They deserve, and are entitled to, the same rights and freedoms as every other American, including the most fundamental freedom to be their true selves.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 87 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm a trans person and condemn anyone who won't vote to stop a fascist dictator that wants me dead from obtaining the nuclear codes

[-] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 7 months ago

When can we start voting for someone good instead of merely less bad? How do we get to that point?

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Petition for an end to FPTP voting. Ranked choice will be the death of the Republican party.

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

See: improvements in Alaska (of all places) for details

[-] VoterFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I would think it would take 4 back to back presidential election wins by the Democratic party. Maybe 3 if it included wipeouts of Republicans in Congress and at the state level. No party can survive being out of power for that long without changing and shifting towards were voters are and that leaves the Democrats room to shift left to solidify that flank.

We've already had 1. We're on the cusp of a possible second. That means we could be 4 years from a complete collapse of the Republican party, if people were actually serious about creating a real leftist movement in this country. That's because winning is how you affect change. A loss just tells politicians that they need to be more like the winner.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The California model. Render Republicans impotent, then you can start enacting real positive changes.

[-] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 6 months ago

That's a good start, I think. The tricky bit is I think you need thirty years straight of good decisions so that the next generation is fully done "correctly". Will be harder to abuse the system after that.

"Be more like the winner" is interesting. Trump is a populist and he was more worried about Bernie than Clinton.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Gotta get rid of First Past the Post voting. And increase the size of the House. Even then, there can be only one President, so he necessarily won't be someone you perfectly agree with, he will represent the broader coalition that your party is part of in government. But I think that's as close as we could get in a Democracy.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

This is a question for democracies in general. I don't think any country has solved this yet, so to speak

[-] eldavi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’m a trans person and condemn anyone who won’t vote to stop a fascist dictator that wants me dead from obtaining the nuclear codes

i've been trying to find someone who's life had been impacted by biden's support of don't-ask-don't-tell; defense-of-marriage-act; executive-order-10450; ice; straight-marriage-only-in-2006 to ask if they still support him; but it seems that only the young who are ignorant of his past; those who "avoid politics"; and those that were never affected universally support him.

if you're not one of these three groups; i'd like to hear your thoughts on why he switched to pro-lgbt: do you think it's because it was more politically advantageous of him? did he hate lgbt in the past because it acceptable and, if so, if it were still acceptable would he continue to hate lgbt?

i ask because my life has been thoroughly fucked by each one of these policies and it took A LOT of effort to rebuild my life so it's obvious that i wouldn't support him; but i'm wondering if there's anyone else out there whose life has also been thoroughly fucked by these policies, but still support him somehow.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I'm only voting for him because the other option and inaction are death sentences. I don't like the guy at all and would vote for someone else given the option.

That said, for all his centrist tendencies he does seem to occasionally cave in to pressure. It just takes time.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

That moment when doing what your constituents want you to do is "caving to pressure" ugh

This is a Democracy. Biden was elected to enact the will of the people. If all of a sudden America became fascinated with the color yellow, I would expect him to start wearing yellow pins. If the American people change their minds, our elected leaders should also change their minds, because they work for us.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i don't know about you; but i've been voting for the "lesser evil" for 40 years now and there's never been anything other than voting for the "lesser evil" each time.

i've started to believe that our circumstances are engineered so that we will only continue to get the "lesser evil" guaranteeing that we will eventually get the greater evil anyways and biden doesn't have another 25 years to cave in to pressure.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Petition for an end to FPTP voting if you want to see change.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (76 replies)
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
600 points (92.3% liked)

politics

19121 readers
3596 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS