171
submitted 8 months ago by tkk13909@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Does having an AirBNB setup make someone deserving of the guillotine or does that only apply to owners of multiple houses? What about apartments?

Please explain your reasoning as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

If you are making money on a place where someone lives then it all counts.

Airbnb is worse than traditional landlords because they remove supply for people to live (excluding shared spaces).

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago
[-] june@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I struggled with this a lot when I got a roommate last year that’s paying rent.

I’ve come to terms with it recognizing that we are supporting each other. I’m supporting them by providing them a stable and affordable place to live, and they’re supporting me by helping me make ends meet, especially in a time when I’m unemployed. I’m not profiting off of them or taking a living space from another family. I also plan to calculate the portion of equity they contribute to the mortgage and give it to them whenever I wind up selling.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

You bastard, you're basically Trump senior! /s

[-] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 8 months ago

What if you need to move interstate for work for a year. Are you meant to sell your house? And incur all the selling and buying costs? Are you meant to leave it vacant for a year? Or are you meant to let people stay in it for free?

It makes sense to rent it out for the year, and rent yourself in the other state.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

You're right; lots of shitty edge cases exist. If you are trading 1 for 1 it's not the core issue.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The long term solution to this is high quality public housing allowing people to move when needed. It's a bit of a pipe dream in our current world, but if we are talking edge cases, I can be idealistic.

Ownership isn't for everyone, that's okay, but profiting from a basic need for another human, shelter, is immortal. We should be a society that provides basic needs to people without allowing others to exploit them for profit.

I am not saying everyone must own, and you can't rent, but it's the profiteering I have a problem with, not the need for someone to live or move.

[-] locuester@lemmy.zip -4 points 8 months ago

Be careful with this dangerous logic. You’ll get pitchforked.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago

This is the internet, absolutes or gtfo!

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
171 points (82.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44135 readers
930 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS