1217
submitted 7 months ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago

I think going forward we need to look at packages with a single or few maintainers as target candidates. Especially if they are as widespread as this one was.

In addition I think security needs to be a higher priority too, no more patching fuzzers to allow that one program to compile. Fix the program.

I'd also love to see systems hardened by default.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 31 points 7 months ago

Packages or dependencies with only one maintainer that are this popular have always been an issue, and not just a security one.

What happens when that person can't afford to or doesn't want to run the project anymore? What if they become malicious? What if they sell out? Etc.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

What if the repository becomes stupid and takes a package away from a developer and said developer deletes his other packages. See leftpad.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
1217 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

48335 readers
1309 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS