599
submitted 2 years ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 58 points 2 years ago

So Trump Media is operating on a revenue stream of 4 million a year, and is reporting a yearly loss of 58 million. How the fuck is that company's stock rated at $60/share?

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 68 points 2 years ago

It's a vehicle for trump to accept foreign money, that's how.

[-] Teon@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

He overvalued it like he does everything he owns. The same thing he already got in trouble for in new York. This time it's with a fake tech company instead of real estate.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You can set the initial sell price in an IPO but nobody is obligated to buy it. Markets determine market price, and especially in tech they're speculative in nature. This is in no way shape or form the same as what he did with his real estate.

This current valuation is probably propped up by the same idiot base who buys his Bible's and NFTs, or by foreign (or domestic) investors looking to indirectly buy his favour in anticipation of a 2nd presidency. Maybe a combination of the 2.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I wonder if there's actual serious investors valuing it that high, basing it on the possibility of a Trump win in the presidential election? Trump comes to power, does all his crazy fascist things and becomes dictator-for-life, and Truth Social becomes THE state media. Stock in in any other media company becomes worthless when Trump starts using the power of the presidency to shut them all down and we've only got one state-owned media company reporting on everything. It's scary, but as an investor it might make a certain amount of sense.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Given how much government money was spent at mar-a-lago it's not at all absurd to say that part of the market price is based on the speculation of DJT receiving favourable government treatment/contracts if we see a second Trump term.

I'd be curious to see how tightly polling correlates with DJT market value. It's basically a corruption perception R2 index.

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Well first, throw logic out the door and you’ll come by your answer a little easier. hint, it’s because of capitalism.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 13 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't be surprised if it's just like essentially "Trump Bitcoin." Effectively worthless but he's got a gigantic pool of people who will throw money at him.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

Share price has never really been a representation of company health. Shares are traded at what people will buy them for. There also may be a lot of short selling going on waiting for the plummet.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

DJT and RDDT both had a bit of a dead cat bounce today.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Rational markets 👍

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

It's a money laundering shell

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

It's worth $50, not $60. Anyway, share prices are arbitrary because they depend on the number of shares.

Trump Media has a market cap of $5b, about the same as Lyft which also hasn't turned a profit.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
599 points (97.9% liked)

News

36453 readers
703 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS