submitted 5 months ago by slingstone@lemmy.world to c/buildapc@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm looking to replace the HDD on an HP Pavilion dv 6 6130-us. It has an i-3 2330M CPU. I know it's old as dirt, but I'd like to use it to run old games. It's also the only thing I own with a CD drive.

I've upgraded the RAM to the maximum it will support (16 GB). I'm thinking an SSD will help it run a great deal faster, but I'm stuck on what to get. So far, the Crucial MX500 seems like a good choice, but I'm wondering if any semi-reliable cheap SSD will do for something this old. I have to stick with something with a 2.5 inch form factor that uses SATA. Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

You won't notice the higher speeds on the Samsung models. You might not even notice the speed difference between the Crucial vs whatever the cheapest option available at Micro Center, but this one is a bit tougher to say.

If you're ok with the Crucial MX500, it will be a huge upgrade.

Source: I upgraded a 3rd Gen laptop to the MX500 for occasional use while traveling. It's only recently that I'm considering buying a new one.

[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

With an older machine, would it matter if I got a dram-less SSD? Would I notice a significant difference? I've seen a Teamgroup SSD (the T-force Vulcan Z) that's a bit cheaper, but it has no cache. It does appear to have a newer architecture though that appears to give it a longer life.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024

12 points (100.0% liked)

Buildapc

3699 readers

20 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Lemmenmo@lemmy.world