232

Putin appeared paralyzed and unable to act in first hours of rebellion (wapo.st)

submitted 1 year ago by Peaces@infosec.pub to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

201 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

"Actually being state-run is okay when our guys do it"

Before you whine, let me add that RT is a rag, though every now and then it has a good article and sometimes covering things western outlets refuse to is a good thing (like the recent-ish stuff with Seymour Hersh), but to say that VoA isn't notoriously propaganda or that BBC articles aren't mostly rightwing drivel is unhinged neoliberal bullshit.

(BBC does have some good TV programs, but those are fiction and documentaries, the news is awful)

[-] Veraticus@lib.lgbt -4 points 1 year ago

"Actually being state-run is okay if those journalistic institutions can be independently verified to offer high-quality, objective reporting, based on nothing more than an analysis of that reporting -- especially with regards to that institution's stances of its government's actions."

Not sure why this is so hard for you all. Like, actually, in order to determine if a news source is good, we have to -- shockingly! -- examine the output of that news source. By this metric, the VOA and BBC are pretty good... uh, single Tweets notwithstanding.

[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I think people find it pointless because you're surely going to dismiss counterexamples as edge cases and remembering all the various horseshit we've seen over the years to compile it and then be told we're cherry-picking is not how anyone wants to spend their free time, so it's much more efficient to work from first principles. I'm sure I couldn't quote some old Soviet news article to you, could I?

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Comparing VoA to the BBC or CBC is... silly.

The BBC and CBC are public service broadcasters with a primarily domestic market, while VoA and RT are state-controlled international broadcasters. The sources of funding are different, the target market is different, and the entire management structure is different.

The President can dictate through executive order to the VoA, but the Prime Minister cannot dictate what the BBC or CBC does (and, often times, these public service broadcasters are happy to lambast the governing party).

[https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-we-charity-margaret-trudeau-alexandre-1.5645781] [https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-65961889]

Find me a articles from the VoA or RT that criticize the current President.