834
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 8 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If everything is shared under communism, that would include political power. So that would make communism a direct democracy.

Does that sound like the nation's you have in mind?

[-] 33550336@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

If "in the sense being tankie" is not clear enough for you, I do not mean possible communism ideal, but I mean actually existing "communism", like in USSR, which, besides some social advantages, was a red authoritarism.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tankie

[-] janet_catcus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

actually yes.

i see pop up again and again, different ppl quarreling over the meaning of what they say when they use the word communism... the.. ur meaning of communism was what some might call anarcho-syndicalism or similar, and there are some ppl, like apparently sop (though i have no idea what communism means for sop and am merely projecting here) who prefer that word, as it centers around community and avoids talking about anarchism, while some use the word communism to mean what the communist party of some nationstate currently says... or similar "modernizing" takes

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
834 points (100.0% liked)

196

16714 readers
2713 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS