That's just disingenuous. The entire point of all my comments has clearly been that whether or not the mentioned claim is true is irrelevant to the fact of whether it's anti-Semitic, because it is a purely factual claim.

You made incorrect assumptions regarding whether I believe those claims, and as an anecdote I corrected your mistake.

My point stands: I don't need to take a position as to whether the claim in question is true or false in order to argue that it is a factual statement that can be supported or disproven by evidence.

You seem to struggle with the idea of supporting a concept vs. supporting a concrete statement.