721
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 15 points 7 months ago

Everything other than a “hell yes” is a no.

This must be said more frequently. This is the correct attitude. You may be alone longer, but you haven't terrorized anybody. It's a net win.

[-] daellat@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I feel like signals of interest are being conflated with Consent/approval of a date here

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

No, it's not. If I'm talking to someone and they look disinterested, that's not a "hell yes." If they're standing there while their four-top is waiting on refills, that's not a "hell yes."

A "hell yes" is them asking me questions, or sharing a relatable story. It's them smiling and looking at me when I talk. A "hell yes" is me asking "would you like to talk alone" and her saying "hell yes."

Get used to being alone. Learn to love its freedom and spontaneity, and then find someone who's better than that who says "hell yes."

[-] daellat@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well I'm just saying I've had not hell yes signals turned into a hell yes date very quickly when I asked them out. Of course I always ask them very open ended so they have all the chance to say no but I got a "yes of course!"

Sometimes people are just a bit shy or afraid, I know I probably give of pretty meh signals even if I'm crushing hard.

I agree it's very important not to fool yourself but sometimes you gotta ask to know for sure and I don't think it's that black and white all the time

E: love a good Convo down vote no reply.. weak sauce.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I don’t think it’s me terrorizing people when they give me clear answers.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 7 months ago

Are you pulling a #NotAllMen? Really?

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Nope. I think that nobody is terrorizing anyone by receiving clear answers.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 7 months ago

But giving the can be a risk for some people.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Taking a risk is not the same as being terrorized

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 7 months ago

Damn you're thick.

You really don't get the idea of the Schroedinger Rapist, do you?

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

I understand risk and security, sure. I carry a weapon everywhere I go because I understand it intimately.

I just object to the idea a person is “being terrorized” by that situation. As if all the people interacting with them are terrorists, because they are too confused about their relationship to their own fear and safety to carry a weapon.

I got terrorized by one person once, and now I keep that weapon on me at every moment I’m not behind my own locked doors. I do not believe that I am being terrorized, simply because I live in a dangerous environment.

Words have meaning, and the meaning matters. A person who is anxious is not, thereby, being “terrorized”.

“Schrodinger’s rapist” indeed, as if the concept of a dangerous environment didn’t exist before the year 2010 when that term got coined by people who think they’re the first to encounter the world.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

coined by people who think they’re the first to encounter the world

Yet another US asshole who feels like John Wayne with his fucking gun and lacks the minimal empathy to be considered a decent human being.

Get bent.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Yet another leftist whose response to disagreement is to dehumanize the other.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
721 points (80.9% liked)

Comic Strips

12655 readers
2734 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS