28
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by vestmoria@linux.community to c/workreform@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://linux.community/post/767456

I read posts about people quitting jobs because they're boring or there is not much to do and I don't get it: what's wrong with being paid for doing nothing or not much at all?

Examples I can think of: being paid to be present but only working 30 minutes to 2 hours every 8 hours, or a job where you have to work 5 minutes every 30 minutes.

What's wrong with reading a book, writing poetry or a novel, exercising, playing with the smartphone... and going home to enjoy your hobbies fully rested?

Am I missing something?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

The key is that you are working from home, where you have the freedom to use the down time productively, or at least in whatever way you desire. You also have complete control over the space you work in.

Most jobs with downtime don't have that kind of freedom. You're still in the office, in the lobby, at the cash register. You have to be at your post, maintaining appearances for whoever happens to walk by. You might be able to do some light web browsing, but you have to watch out for anyone coming within view of your screen. The suits, or customers if you're any sort of customer facing, feel slighted when they see people appearing to not care about their work.


I lost a job for playing a computer game at my desk while things were slow so I could be available whenever something came up, while multiple co-workers were literally out playing basketball in the gymnasium for our customers, not even at the front desk able to work when a rush hit. A rush did hit, someone got handsy with the one other coworker there (of the six clocked in and supposed to be there), they pulled the tapes, saw what I was doing during the literal hour of nothing, and I was fired. I had previously been told that while they preferred I didn't, I could do what I was doing during downtime so I would always immediately be available to assist customers. No one else even got in trouble, not even the handsy fucking customer.

At another place, our primary duty was answering phones, but an exec made us work a ticket queue as well. Whenever we weren't audibly talking into our headsets he would make shitty comments about us not being busy, despite all our numbers showing otherwise. One magical day we managed to have literally nothing in the ticket queue and no calls coming in. I got in trouble for browsing a work related subreddit trying to find ways to improve my skills.

I've had other jobs where I was told that I could do my schoolwork during my downtime, then been told to stop because it didn't maintain an appearance of company values. To the empty fucking entry hallway of an outdoor pool. It's going to rain today, we aren't going to get many/any customers. I had great rapport with the customers and other staff too, wasn't like I was known as an idiot or a slacker. I'd get calls from the more senior workers at the inside desk when they couldn't figure out basic shit they had been trained on.


My current job is much like yours, work from home tech, and I enjoy being able to take 30 minutes and clear my mind fucking about in a videogame when I get a mental block with some code, being able to do my laundry, clean shit up around the house, read, do hobbies in between meeting calls or when muted on one.

That is so so far from the norm though. Only possible with WFH and if your employer isn't a privacy invading psycho recording what programs you have open and when, mouse movements, etc.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS