153
submitted 5 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

An Australian museum excluded men from an exhibit to highlight misogyny. A man sued for access and won.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/mkwF8

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] doctortofu@reddthat.com 50 points 5 months ago

Protesting misogyny through misandry - what a fabulous idea! Next, how about a protest against childhood obesity by starving a couple of kids to death?

Doing a shitty thing to protest a different shitty thing only multiplies the amount of shit instead of reducing it...

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 1 points 5 months ago

If you think men not being allowed to look at art is actually comparable to the systemic misogyny women have to deal with you're exactly the type of person the piece is highlighting.

[-] marigo@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

The problem is that this kind of approach doesn't solve or work towards improving anything. Mysogynists are just going to double down if they're treated this way, even if an art exhibit is miniscule compared to the other issues.

It's the same as how incels are pushed further into extremism after all other groups exclude and push them away. Those people are looking for a community and a place to fit in, and if the only place that will take them is awful and negative they'll settle there and radicalise. The goal should be to open a constructive discussion and change minds, not just throw more stuff onto the fire.

[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

The goal should be to open a constructive discussion and change minds

You just explained how they don't have a logical position, just a kneejerk reaction to having their behaviour pointed out - you are only fooling yourself if you think there's a constructive discussion available. Grow up and make them fear physical retribution if they keep spreading such abhorrent views.

[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago

While I agree with you in principle, the guy that took this to the courts is a giant dickhead.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 23 points 5 months ago

I consider the court case to be part of the exhibit. Intentionally or not, the plaintiff is part of the exhibit; the judge, the ruling, and even your criticism.

The women who brought these cases against men's clubs were similarly denigrated for ruining the "good thing" the clubs had going for them.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 5 months ago

As seen by the other guy, who upon talking to artist about his similar suit said "oh, I get it now"

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago
[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 months ago

Because thinking he's the victim of an injustice by being denied entry in an exhibit about sexism shows a total lack of empathy for people less privileged than him.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
153 points (98.1% liked)

Interesting Global News

2455 readers
453 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS