1845
submitted 7 months ago by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

The next sentence was about shared infrastructure for the pipes. That multiple gas companies could use to distribute, with the caveat that they still would need to be owned by a single entity whether that's a private company or municipality. I'd argue a municipality is the correct answer here.

If we look at electric as an analogous system, the poles and wires are always owned by a single company and then the supply can be "chosen." Even though it's just routing where your cash goes, since electricity is all pooled. The downside, is no matter how much I may not want to support the company that owns the poles and wires, I have no other option and there is no way for a competitive company to build another product to give the consumer a choice.

It's why I advocate largely for the distribution infrastructure to become public owned, paid for and maintained with taxes. I don't necessarily agree with the production of the gas/electricity/water. If the distribution infrastructure if publicly owned, then so long as a new business creates a product that matches the regulated quality they only need to pay for the permits and means to attach to the distribution network. We can lower the barrier of entry to new competitors.

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago

The minimum standards would be set based on regulatory capture in very many municipalities. I don't think it would be worse than jank monopolies, at least. I don't know that the speed (or incentives) of either is something I trust with keeping up technologically.

Moving from a monopoly to a municipality doesn't help when the standards they set are super strict.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

We've tried that. What's prone to happen is the corporations spend money to the municipalities to deregulate. Let's stop giving them the chance. It hasn't worked. Let's instead go back to treating utilities as publically beneficial

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Or they spend money to make them over regulate. Yeah. If we can't even control local politicians now, how do you propose we do close that bit of fuckery?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 months ago

Continuous community organization and demonstration. Systematic election reform. Solidarity

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Can we do that without any masters? Do we really have to choose one?

[-] _tezz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Man you really just can't stand the idea of doing something without giving your money to venture capitalists, can you? You really think it's better that random billionaires in Silicon Valley and Jackson Hole control your power supply?

Americans are seriously ill, and need help.

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I absolutely can.

Venture capitalists shouldn't exist. Our laws shouldn't insulate people from liability.

[-] _tezz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

How do you suggest we run our utilities without private firms nor government firms?

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

What's the difference between private and government?

We want voluntary associations, yea? So we work with/in our communities. We can choose larger or smaller municipalities or companies, but we don't violate the local, voluntary bits.

[-] _tezz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

What's the difference between private and government?

Welp... In case you don't actually know, a lot....

https://www.cmich.edu/blog/all-things-higher-ed/difference-between-public-and-private-administration

We work with/in our communities.

Right. Our local governments. Government organizations.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

Having no masters would be exactly the aim. Ultimate power should lay in the hands of the people and government should only exist to serve the will of said people. I don't fully know what that should look like but I can say for sure we've tested a lot of ideas that aren't that, and that we should try some new things because what were doing now isn't working.

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

I don't fully know what that should look like but I can say for sure we've tested a lot of ideas that aren't that, and that we should try some new things because what were doing now isn't working.

We're on the same page.

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
1845 points (98.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

2927 readers
629 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS