99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 7 months ago

The numbers are a bit over the place, ranging from 12.5 billion to 44 billion.

[-] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 7 months ago

I feel the number should stop mattering to the penalty well before 1B in fraud.

[-] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 7 months ago

Yeah it was just that the more liberal the news outlet, the higher the number lol

[-] bleepbloopbop@hexbear.net 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

the 44 billion is the total amount of loans she'd given herself and her proxies via her illegal control of the bank. 27 billion is the amount she's supposed to return to avoid death. No idea what the 12.5 number is but it seems to have come from the AP as the amount she embezzled, so maybe that's the amount she took personally, rather than it going to allied companies and such?

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2307 readers
98 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS