258
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MdRuckus@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zorque@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

How is allowing people to identify as the gender that fits them abusive to women?

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -2 points 1 year ago

No one cares what you “identify” as. Identify as a turkey for all anyone cares. The problem is with coerced speech and trying to invade sex-specific places and events.

[-] Nahlej@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Coerced speech? Invading? Boy that does sound scary.

You have any other completely imaginary strawmen we should be hypothetically scared of?

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Coerced speech like how some places are now looking at making "misgendering" and "using the wrong pronouns" illegal.

Not sure what word other than "invading" you would user for biological men going in to places designed specifically only for biological women?

Do you even know what a strawman is?

[-] Nahlej@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Those things you're saying aren't real.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

No? What's this then?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michigan-house-passes-bill-using-wrong-pronouns-felony-fineable-10000

Michigan House passes bill that could make using wrong pronouns a felony, fineable up to $10,000

The bill specifically addresses "sexual orientation" and "gender identity or expression" as protected classes.

[-] DeadlineX@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Did you even read your boogey man bill or just take Fox News as gods word? The bill only says someone is guilty of a felony if they cause damage, bodily harm, or threaten a person because of sexual identity. It just adds a protection to people who are being victimize for a specific aspect of their identity.

As long as you weren’t planning on any hate crimes you can misgender people as much as you want in Michigan. It makes you an asshole, but not a felon.

If you would like to read the bill you’re parroting bullshit about, I can link you to the actual text of it on Michigan’s website so you don’t have to be scared of going to jail for misgendering someone anymore.

Again unless you’re planning a hate crime against them. Then you’re n asshole and a felon. Because hate crimes are bad. That’s not a political thing right? Like damaging someone’s property or body is illegal all the time. It’s just more illegal when you do it intentionally because of an aspect of their identity. I mean you don’t think it’s okay to assault disabled folks because of their disability?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

From the (fox news, of course) link:

A recently passed bill in Michigan could make it a felony to intimidate someone by intentionally using the wrong gender pronouns, according to some legal experts.

The article quotes only one person, but I suppose "some experts" is just an oversight, and not because fox knows its credulous audience won't bother reading too closely or critically. Or looking up the "expert" around whom the story pivots. No huge surprise, he's the founder of a Christian think tank that focuses on legislating Christianity as law. They're anti-lgbt, anti-abortion, and antivaxx.

Got someone who isn't an alarmist bent on violating everyone's religious liberty?

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Again though - the legislation is there. You're simply saying that because the source is a company that you don't like that the information they're reporting on is wrong, which is false.

I don't know what sources reporting on the same actual legislation you'll accept? I didn't go to fox news to find it, i just googled it and that was the top name i recognized of the dozens of sites reporting it. Again - it's in the legislation. It's not a rumour, it's not "fake news".

“Gender identity or expression means having or being perceived as having a gender-related self-identity or expression whether or not associated with an individual’s assigned sex at birth.”

This was specifically added in to the bill when adding them as a "protected class". The legislation introduced hate crime penalties for causing a person to “feel terrorized, frightened, or threatened,” regarding “sexual orientation” and “gender identity or expression.”

Here's an msn one: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/michigan-residents-could-be-charged-with-a-felony-and-fined-up-to-10000-over-wrong-pronouns/ss-AA1dibuC#image=1

Is MSN acceptable for you? Got a list of approved websites that report on legislations?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Here’s an msn one: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/michigan-residents-could-be-charged-with-a-felony-and-fined-up-to-10000-over-wrong-pronouns/ss-AA1dibuC#image=1

That's one sentence long and has no sources at all. You're not even bothering to open these before you post them.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Click through the images.....it's a slideshow with information on each one lol. Who's not even bothering to open these before posting?

Here are links to the actual legislation: https://legiscan.com/MI/bill/HB4474/2023

On there, what is under Subjects?

Civil rights: sex discrimination and harassment

Civil rights: sexual orientation discrimination

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Click through the images…it’s a slideshow with information on each one lol.

Oh, how about that. So, that slideshow only quotes the same "expert" as the fox news did.

Here are links to the actual legislation:

You're relying on one bigoted alarmist's deliberate misinterpretation of the law.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

The law specifically puts “gender identity” as a protected class for this legislation. Why do you think that is?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Because they... want them to be protected by the law?

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

Now put that together with the context of these hate speech law changes and you see what that means?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It means they're protected by the law. Not this sky-is-falling nonsense from one guy whose job it is to scream sky-is-falling nonsense.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…….which is the point that you guys are saying isn’t true.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…

According to one guy who is deliberately misinterpreting the law because he's a bigoted alarmist who doesn't want trans people having any legal protections at all. You keep ignoring this.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 1 year ago

I’m sure you don’t even see the irony in saying that’s just one persons opinion of it, like a random staunch democrat voters opinion isn’t biased in one direction.

What you mean to say is that you disagree and think the law won’t be enforced that way. The law makes it possible to enforce misgendering as hate speech.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
258 points (92.4% liked)

politics

19072 readers
1848 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS