1080
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It always does, imo. Most of the time devil’s advocate isn’t meant to actually “defend” anything, but to find flaws/imperfections in your logic so you can adjust it and when you have to argue with an actual ~~Xi bootlicker~~ “devil”, they’ll have less ammo to refute your point.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It always does, imo.

Not always. Sometimes it's just amplifying the devil's arguments by repetition. Time and place, and all that jazz.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The initial exaggeration was probably unintentional, due to second-hand eyewitness testimony getting relayed as fact in the middle of the chaos. But it was later used to pretend nothing happened, which clearly isn't the case. My girlfriend is Chinese and has no idea anything ever happened in Tiananmen Square: she didn't even know that date was censored online, so whatever they're doing is working very well.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
1080 points (97.9% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7309 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS