31
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nac82@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How do you think this situation would have been different if he would have lost the presidential election to Trump or if Trump had successfully overthrown democracy to seize control of America?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago

Trump is one of the few presidents who'd have handled this worse than Biden. Notable the list of "better than Biden on Palestine affairs" includes figures such as Reagan and George Bush, so it's not a high bar.

[-] nac82@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That doesn't really address the reality we were dealt. We aren't discussing hypothetically who the best president would have been in this moment, I'm asking about the real 2 options that could have played out these last 4 years.

Part of what electing Biden did was prevent the Trump response in these moments, I'm asking how this person thinks things would have been better if we hadn't united behind Biden.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's not what they're saying, though. They never said the party shouldn't have united behind Biden.

[-] nac82@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Which is why I clarified the hypothetical I was asking about because that is not the reality we were dealing with.

It's weird you referenced your own comment in 3rd person. Did you forget to swap to your alt?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

I'm referring to the top-level comment you replied to.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
31 points (76.3% liked)

Israel and Palestine Politics Discussion

312 readers
3 users here now

The sole purpose of this community is to discuss Israeli and Palestinian issues. It is not the place for hurling insults, rehashing grudges, or making up history. Any conversation that veers into the "if only your people had" realm will be deleted or locked right away. I started this community in the potentially fruitless hope that we may have a civil conversation about this issue.

Rules:

  1. References to historical events must include a reputable source. The definition of reputable is up to the mods. Keep that in mind.
  2. Articles from reputable sources only.
  3. No name-calling. That's what DMs are for. /s
  4. Keep it in English. If I don't understand the word, it gets removed. Obvious exceptions would be the use of proper names and references. For example, "wadi" when used to refer to a place is acceptable.
  5. Discussions that are heading into the probability of becoming a flame war will be locked.
  6. Repeat offenders will be forced to find another community.
  7. Anti-Zionism is ok. Anti-Semitism is not.
  8. Whataboutism is for toddlers. Try to grow up.
  9. Posting articles about current events is encouraged. Posting the same story from 20 different sources is not.
  10. Posting an article purely for the purpose of saying "Look what monsters they are" is discouraged unless it can generate an honest discussion. This is probably the most difficult rule to follow.
  11. No calling anyone a terrorist.
  12. No YouTube links. Some of us can read.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS