149
How do people with aphantasia play chess?
(lemmy.world)
# | Player | Country | Elo |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Magnus Carlsen | ๐ณ๐ด | 2839 |
2 | Fabiano Caruana | ๐บ๐ธ | 2786 |
3 | Hikaru Nakamura | ๐บ๐ธ | 2780 |
4 | Ding Liren ๐ | ๐จ๐ณ | 2780 |
5 | Alireza Firouzja | ๐ซ๐ท | 2777 |
6 | Ian Nepomniachtchi | ๐ท๐บ | 2771 |
7 | Anish Giri | ๐ณ๐ฑ | 2760 |
8 | Gukesh D | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2758 |
9 | Viswanathan Anand | ๐ฎ๐ณ | 2754 |
10 | Wesley So | ๐บ๐ธ | 2753 |
September 4 - September 22
I have not once mentioned personality tests you troglodyte.
You know what buddy, let's say you ARE right and the solutions you posted ARE a cure to ADHD. How do you explain healthy people, like athletes and a lot of nutritionalists who are fit, who have ADHD and, despite being fit & eating well, still suffer symptoms of the disorder and may participate in therapy for it or take medication for it? Do those people not exist to you, or let me guess, you're gonna say they're faking it?
Michael Phelps has ADHD, and is the most decorated Olympian of all time. He has talked about ADHD quite a lot. Michelle Carter, Terry Bradshaw, Kevin Garnett. All legends in the sport. And these are just the household names, multiple studies put the prevalence of ADHD in college athletics/professional athletics as higher than in non-athletes of the same demographics.
You have so far not actually provided evidence for your assertions, and your false claims fly in the face of actual reality. You can't actually muster up anything that says exercise and healthy eating cures ADHD because it's just not true.
The comparison to personality tests is derogatory, as is the comparison to mood rings and MBTI tests. You're like the kids on tiktok who diagnose themselves with autism and participate in self-reporting studies.
HAHAHAHAHAH you sound exactly like MBTI freaks. "Kim Kardashian is an ENFP! I believe MLK was an INTJ!" seriously go look up "famous/historical figures mbti" that's where the comparison is coming from. You're not being put on trial, you neurotic mess! I'm trying to clarify your "misunderstandings" which are painfully annoying attempts to create gotchas
You have no evidence or actual science backing your claims so you're resorting to having an outburst and using emotion in place of science. You have yet to even mention a single real source, and you have the audacity to say I'm the one without evidence. lol