423
YouTube puts third-party clients on notice: Show ads or get blocked
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
423 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
34899 readers
366 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not about wanting everything for free, it's about billionaires asking for more all the time. I can't find any information about the costs of running YouTube, but it's definitely making a profit. It's making over 30 billion in ad revenue and 15 billion from subscriptions. And somehow that's not enough and they need more.
I don't understand why people feel the need to defend billionaires and their corporations out of all the things to spend your time on...
So how would you like to pay for YouTube?
Out of the billions of dollars that Alphabet extracts from harvesting your data and selling it to advertisers?
Stfu, I'm subbed. But as soon as I get an ad or a price hike, I'm out. And I'm not gonna blame anyone that can't or won't pay. Especially when there's ads every 2 minutes. That shit is abusive. Defending it is fucking disgusting. Can't think of anything in this world that's a bigger waste of time...like.. literally you could do anything else and it'd be more worthwhile.
Btw. How are you paying for Lemmy?
I’m not!
I also wouldn’t be bitching if they charged or wanted ads.
At that point I would probably just pay them.
Same way I used to pay for YouTube and currently pay for Podcasts: A small number of ads, at a designated spot, that I can skip through if I don't want to watch.
It would be trivial for youtube to stop adblockers by making the ads indistinguishable from the rest of the stream: Coming from the same source and behaving like the rest of the video (your controls don't get locked). But that doesn't grow their every increasing hoard of wealth fast enough. The product must be made worse for profits to grow more, and according to you I should be thanking them for decreasing the quality of their product for me. $30 billion is not enough! The company demands infinite growth in a closed system! (Or as biologists call it: cancer)