112
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0x0@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago

I did, actually. One was a "good" manager because both my team and the customer were fully committed to agile and he (along with the tech lead/senior dev) ensured requirements were well-defined and locked by the time they reached the team; the other was good 'cos she kept all the shit from upstream management - many layers or course - from hitting the team's fan (we noticed when she left).

These are the exceptions.

Let me rephrase: do management tasks require someone full-time and/or can they be diluted throughout the team? Does one need to be managed to work well?

[-] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

it just depends on the specifics. a manager (or management team) can theoretically offload administrative stuff in big organizations that would overwhelm everyone at the edge to distribute

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

I can't shake the feeling that administrative stuff only grows because people need to justify their jobs.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
112 points (91.8% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
168 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS