288
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 91 points 7 months ago

Cutting Social Security is also known as killing retirees.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

Take that boomers.... /s

In bird culture. This is seen as a dick move.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They staggered the reduction last time. This time it would really hurt Gen X forward.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 7 points 7 months ago
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Agreed. Vote blue.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Maybe .... And Maybe they will pull a Spanish Inquisition.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't expect them to do that, no.

[-] Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I won't lie; I upvoted (or whatever the lemmy version is) because I'm a sucker for any R&M reference.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

If they aren't making Republicans richer, the redcoats don't care.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 months ago

A neighbor of mine relies on social security and said he only gets $3000/year. He's a cancer survivor in poor health with crippling bipolar disorder and lives in a care home. The home provides food and shelter but not clothing or recreation, so the locals always help him out. He's only in his 60s. How is anyone supposed to survive like that? If they cut his pay any further he straight up won't be able to live.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Well you see, at this point since he is no longer able to be exploited for capital, he is no longer useful to the ruling class, and must be discarded. He is a burden to the system an no longer has value. - right wing politics.

[-] 108@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

My Mom will lose her home as well.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

If that’s $3k/yr after paying a care home, that’s not so bad.

Social security is based on what you pay in: your top 35 years. If he truly only gets $3k/year, did he even work? Yes, you could argue there should be something need based

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Sorry what?? $250 a month is not enough even when you don't have to pay for housing or food. He would still have to pay if he wanted a cell phone. What about this copay on meds? I doubt there he has that coved 100%. According to the AARP "...1 in 5 adults of Medicare age, out-of-pocket health care costs in 2021 exceeded $2,000..." Or say he wants to go anywhere. It is likely he can't drive, and if he could he couldn't afford to keep a car, so that is rideshare or taxis for anywhere the senior van doesn't go. Assuming there even is one.

But no he is most likely getting more than 3K but it is eaten up by the care home. Medicare is terrible at covering any type of assisted living. It covers full on hospital stays but the light care that keeps people out of the hospital not so much.

https://www.aarp.org/health/medicare-qa-tool/does-medicare-cover-all-health-care-costs.html

https://www.aarp.org/health/medicare-qa-tool/does-medicare-cover-assisted-living.html

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Lol you think they'll stop paying? If they cut the payroll tax it'll just get paid with debt....just like it is right now.

We need to get ss needs based.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

Cutting payroll taxes is also known as cutting regressive taxation

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
288 points (97.4% liked)

News

23388 readers
1622 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS