716

These 112 House Republicans voted against Ukraine aid (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

229 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The House passed a more than $60 billion bill that provides more military aid to Ukraine.
It's part of a larger foreign aid package that's likely to pass the Senate and be signed into law.
112 Republicans voted it against — the most ever, and a majority of the GOP conference.

…

Saturday's vote marked the first time the House had approved billions of dollars in Ukraine aid since December 2022, when Democrats still controlled the chamber.

In the two years since Russia's invasion, opposition to aiding Ukraine has grown from a fringe position to a majority view among House GOP lawmakers. Many argue the money should be spent domestically or that policy changes at the US-Mexico border should take precedence.

Here are the 112 House Republicans who voted against the bill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 107 points 7 months ago

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 66 points 7 months ago

For those who don't know, The New York Post was the first American media outlet that Rupert Murdoch brought back in the day. It tries to play off being 'center Right' as opposed to Fox News. Following the spin on the spin can break your neck.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

When a Republican loses Rupert Murdock, things probably aren’t going the way you planned.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago

It's a New York paper, so they can hate on MGT. They don't have to be consistent with the message from one branch tp the other.

I remember back in 2008. The Post had two op-ed pieces on the same page. One writer said that Obama was just another neoliberal hack who'd push a softer version of GOP plans and the voters should just opt for McCain. The other said that Obama was a hard Left radical who would about an extremist agenda.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

The Post had two op-ed pieces on the same page. One writer said that Obama was just another neoliberal hack who’d push a softer version of GOP plans and the voters should just opt for McCain. The other said that Obama was a hard Left radical who would about an extremist agenda.

It's choose your own hatred adventure!

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I still like Moscow Marge more... But hey.
Marjory Traitor Green.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Perjury Traitor Scheme

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

https://nypost.com/2024/04/20/us-news/house-approves-95b-in-military-aid-for-israel-ukraine/

The actual story if anyone wants to read that rag.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I've heard that Marjorie Taylor Greene is just Dog the Bounty Hunter in drag. I mean, has anyone seen the two of them in the same place at the same time?

Also, I've heard that she (he?) has a cleft butthole.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024

716 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19148 readers

3046 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News