68
Ubuntu Snap Hate
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
68 points (90.5% liked)
Linux
48349 readers
456 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I read a comment on Reddit a while back that pointed out how much of the open source community has no issue hosting projects on GitHub while also lampooning Snap for having a closed-source backend server. However, since Snap (and GitHub) are open source themselves, nothing is stopping curious and concerned users from auditing the codebase or hosting their own servers. I removed Snap from my Ubuntu installation and use Flatpak instead, but I do not hate Snap. And for what it's worth, I always go for the native DEB when possible...
What? Github is not open source.
And plenty of people have issues with Github: https://sfconservancy.org/GiveUpGitHub/
I really think people get confused between Git, the open source application, and Github the non-open-source online code repository.
Part of the reason they probably think they are one and the same is how often Git is used in command line to clone a Github repository locally.
Gitlab is open source and self-hostable, to my knowledge.
I heard a good comparison on here a while ago: Github is to Git as Pornhub is to porn.
Gitlab is out, forgejoe is in
That was the point they were making. GitHub is to git as the snap store is to snap, albeit there are existing alternatives to GitHub.
The comparison isn't quite right because you can use git with any provider (Github, gitlab, etc), including multiple at once.
On the other hand, snap is hardcoded to only be able to use one store at a time, the snap store. To modify this behaviour, you would have to make changes to the snap client source code.
It's a crucial difference.