433
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don’t really use TikTok but I really hope this gets tossed by the courts. I don’t care if ByteDance is owned by cthulus and draculas, it’s a terrible precedent to have the government ban a media company. If we don’t like China having access to data, ban apps from collecting it in the first place. Require algorithm audits. There are so many better ways to handle this than singling out TikTok.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

Everybody talks about Facebook like they’re owned by the American government. They’re not. I’m sure the US government gets massive amounts of data from them, but they can’t control Facebook in the way China can control Tik Tok. And much of their surveillance is public with warrants whereas China does not need to follow any of that.

[-] isles@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I get it. But it’s night and day different than the actual government owning the company.

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

If you think the Chinese government doesn’t have its hand directly up in Tik Tok, you’re absolutely fooling yourself. China has much more direct control over companies, well beyond what the US government has.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

So this bill is not going to do anything but require ByteDance to sell the tiny small insignificant minuscule 1% that the Chinese government owns and in no way uses to influence how the company is run.

Sounds like it’s no big deal!

[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

Don't forget, control the sale of data too. Audits etc to make sure they comply with privacy safeguards, and so on.

This is just pandering as well as, I suspect, to give a corporate donor a profit-making business.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The precedent was already set back in 2020 when the US government forced Kunlun to sell Grindr

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

it’s a terrible precedent to have the government ban a media company

Good thing TikTok's not actually being banned then isn't it? It's just being forcibly sold, which is quite different.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
433 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59366 readers
2087 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS