159

Corporate Open Source is Dead (m.youtube.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MRLimcon@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 24 points 7 months ago

Corporate

Open source

Pick one. Capitalism cannot abide anything not being commodified. "Corporate open source" is an inherently contradictory term.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 22 points 7 months ago

I’m not here to defend capitalism, only to say that capitalism and open source have had a more complicated relationship than that.

The Apache HTTP Server was the preeminent dot-com era open source project. It’s hard to imagine the dot-com boom without it. People seem to forget that it was corporate open source. It was “a patchy server” developed (from NCSA HTTPd) and maintained largely by internet startups like Organic, Inc. Many other critical components of the dot-com tech stack were similarly developed.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

The project is jointly managed by a group of volunteers located around the world, using the Internet and the Web to communicate, plan, and develop the server and its related documentation.

This is what I mean though. Most groundbreaking development is done voluntarily or with public funds. It is antithetical to capitalism.

Capital comes in AFTER it is proven useful and/or profitable.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago

Open Source has been historically tied to corporations. It kicked off with Netscape opening their browser. Eric S Raymond was a major player behind the term, and he's explicitly right-Libertarian.

Free Software, OTOH, is a different matter. I think the two are overdue for a divorce.