149

The Slow Fedi Movement: Toward a Green, Independent, and Equitable Fediverse (thedabbler.patatas.ca)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by smallpatatas@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Fediverse - especially the microblogging side of it - has deep issues when it comes to environmental sustainability.

And the high resource requirements, which result from an incredible level of redundancy, aren't just bad environmentally: they make running a server more costly, and increase our reliance on Big Tech's infrastructure.

I wrote about all this, along with some suggestions for how we can improve things somewhat.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] halm@leminal.space 2 points 4 months ago

That's my intuition too. Would like to see sources to back it up though.

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well this site says that the bitcoin network uses at least 91 TWh annually.

According to fediverse.observer, there's roughly 21000 Fediverse servers online.

Let's just assume that a server on the Fediverse uses 500W. That's quite a high estimate btw, but we can overestimate, it's fine.

That gives roughly 0.09 TWh annually, or about 0.1% of the bitcoin network. And remember that's an overestimate and remember that that only considers bitcoin and no other cryptocurrencies.