436
submitted 7 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago

Banning TikTok in an election year is proof Democrats don't want to win.

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Lol it was bipartisan. Not just democrats, Republicans as well.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 22 points 7 months ago

So what? This only pisses off the Democrat's base and it will make them stay home.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago

Notably the ban doesn’t kick in until after the election, after which it may not even be Biden’s problem. Maybe ByteDance will shut it down sooner. Maybe the next administration won’t follow through with the ban. 🤷

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 24 points 7 months ago

It was smart to delay the ban. The original bill would have banned it before the election - monumentally stupid! This, at least, delays the impact.

People are paying attention, though, and TikTok has been buying ads to campaign against this law. It's still going to have an impact.

[-] livus@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

And Biden himself has a tiktok account that pumps out content.

The whole thing is very cynical and weird.

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

It's a piss poor attempt to try control tiktok and ensure they play along. They don't really want it banned, they just want to control the flow of information and it's absolutely destroying the illusion of the first amendment!

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Ehhh...I doubt it.

[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

The sell-or-ban measure was signed into law by US President Joe Biden on Wednesday.

This is the important part you might have missed, without a president signing it into law it means nothing.

Similar to when Biden said he would never sign a M4A bill (4yrs ago), he would veto, which became a deal breaker to some on the far left.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=biden+veto+medicare+for+all+bill

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

What’s the overlap between people who vote Republican and people who use Tiktok? I’m actually curious.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The age range skews younger, so probably not huge. It's definitely there though - lots of "tradwife" thinly disguised fetish content. 😒

There's a reason Trump came out against this ban, he knows it's going to be unpopular and he loses nothing by flip-flopping on it.

This is just a free W for Trump and an L for Democrats with literally zero upsides. It accomplishes nothing besides pissing people off!

[-] livus@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago

lots of “tradwife”

Wild, I've never stumbled on any of that. But it has a really sensitive algorithm and I'm pretty firmly entrenched in the science-travel-pets axis.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, unless there’s a credible national security angle that’s being kept confidential. I kind of suspect there is, since Trump tried to push through similar legislation, but worded it so badly that it never got out of debate… and the likes of Wyden voted for it even while they said it was the wrong legislation to solve the problem.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 7 months ago
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

Lmao and then they get mad at communist political comissars.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Please don't tell me you actually believe them when they cry about national security. It's almost always a lie.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Usually it’s about economics. But in this case, it may actually be true.

Generally, I consider real natsec issues to be things they can’t tell the public. So when I see privacy minded reps joining in with reps from both side of the aisle, I’m willing to lend a bit of credence to a security angle.

Assuming it’s not just the US being upset that some other autocratic government is controlling the medium du jour.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

... and so by whining about natsec they can get you to support anything, as long as they don't tell you about it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's actually already banned in multiple countries, especially for anyone in government positions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_TikTok

[-] livus@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

According to the world map in this link the countries that have banned it outright are: North Korea, China, Iran, Syria, Jordan, Uzbekistan, Krzykstan, India, Nepal, and Somalia.

(For anyone else like me who has trouble with unlabeled maps).

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

What about according to the text on that damn page?

[-] livus@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

The text is poorly organized, the map is faster.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

You'd be surprised. I used to work in a rural factory. All the big burly red-neck older men were on tiktok during their smoke breaks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, that is just another reason the DNC/Democrates will continue to lose support, compared to 2020.

Some also left the duopoly due to following the DNC Fraud Lawsuit, Bernie Sanders 2016.

Interesting times we are living in, we shall continue to follow!

load more comments (26 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
436 points (97.0% liked)

World News

32352 readers
798 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS