Not directly related to this blog post but from NixOS discourse forum, a tl;dr from another person about the NixOS drama here :
If you’re looking for a TL;DR of the situation, here it is:
Nix community had a governance crisis for years. While there has been progress on building explicit teams to govern the project, it continued to fundamentally rely on implicit authority and soft power
Eelco Dolstra, as one of the biggest holders of this implicit authority and soft power, has continuously abused this authority to push his decisions, and to block decisions that he doesn’t like
Crucially, he also used his implicit authority to block any progress on solving this governance crisis and establishing systems with explicit authority
This has led uncountably many people to burn out over the issue, and culminated in writing an open letter to have Eelco resign from all formal positions in the project and take a 6 month break from any involvement in the community
Eelco wrote a response that largely dismisses the issues brought up, and advertises his company’s community as a substitute for Nix community
TL;DR is in OP's post, but basically Eelco Dolstra (the leader of the Nix project) refuses to restructure his community and consistently ignores the advice of his colleagues. This has led to poor moderation in Nix (flakes are considered experimental even though LITERALLY EVERYONE HAS USED THEM FOR YEARS) and white techbros invading the space and making it unsafe.
An ultimatum was set up (May 1st, I think) and whatever happens after that day is anyone's guess. Nix is a huge project so forking it is not as simple as things like PolyMC being forked into Prism Launcher. I'm personally worried but also glad that these things are coming to light.
why even fork it instead of switching to guix?
Good point, Guix needs more contributors and I think this is just the thing to do it since Guix is feature-parity with Nix besides Nix's first-class support for proprietary software.