83
Removed (reddthat.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by 01010101011@reddthat.com to c/anticonsumption@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 6 months ago

Is this in response to union efforts?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 months ago

It's because they announced to shareholders they made $500 million less than expected in the last 3 months. They expected to make $9.1 billion but made $8.6 billion. Their sales are down worldwide indicating it's not just a US thing.

[-] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Or the opposite. I now actively avoid Starbucks due to their behavior towards unions. When I do go, I always ask the employees if they have unionized yet.

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago

Possibly. Starbucks, Workers United made ‘significant progress’ in last week’s contract talks.

I wouldn't put it past them to under-report their earnings to get more leverage in unionization negotiations, engineering a temporary drop in share price.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Is that your kink?

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
83 points (92.8% liked)

Anticonsumption

317 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS