270
submitted 6 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15089465

Americans Are Open To Cheap Chinese Cars. That’s 'Scary' For The Rest Of The Auto Industry

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 78 points 6 months ago

Don't cram touchscreens and smart features into every fucking aspect of your car. Keep your costs low, keep prices low, and believe it or not, you'll tap into the "bottom" 60% of the market that has been forced to buy used for the last 10 years. I don't want a base trim 10 year old Honda Accord with 150k miles, but it's all I can find for under $20k.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

Touchscreens and "smart" features don't add enough cost to justify the premium you pay for them.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 16 points 6 months ago

This. Removing the $200 Android tablet from the dash isn't going to make cars suddenly $5,000 cheaper.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

but they love charging 5k for it though.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I keep getting shit on for wanting an EV with manual roll-up windows where you have to use your hands, a super basic FM stereo kit, and a dash clock being the most advanced shit inside. I don't need rear-view cameras and sensors and other shit that complicates and increases repair and insurance costs. I don't get it. Give me dead simple, please and thank you.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Back up cameras are mandatory in the US, and apparently Automatic Emergency Braking will be mandatory starting in 2029, so you'll be stuck with some sensors whether you like it or not.

But otherwise I agree that buttons and dials are better for controlling AC and radio than a touchscreen ever will be.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 months ago

Yeesh. I'm still driving a vehicle from 1999. Guess I'm out of the loop on the backup camera thing.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 6 points 6 months ago

Backup cameras are useless for many people. I can either wear glasses so that I can see where I’m driving, or I can take them off to see the fisheyed backup screen. Not both.

[-] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

Backup cameras are pretty good imo because they let you see the small things you wouldn't be able to see out of a mirror. Helps prevent needless accidents. If you don't wanna use it, just don't look at it. Most cars should still have rear view mirrors

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

the backup camera is useful when the rear window is obstructed (such as from mud/dust) and for comically large vehicles where a short pole wouldn't be visible if it was less than 3ft behind it.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago

Good thing glasses are permanently superglued to your face and thus it’s impossible to swap between having them on and off when swapping between going backwards and forwards…

[-] lmorchard@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

That's not a reasonable thing to expect to have to do while driving. Sounds like the "you're holding it wrong" of cars

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 6 months ago

Except for those of us who, you know, like to see where we're going rather than relying on a limited FOV camera. Of course, if I could learn to remove and replace them while keeping both hands engaged in actually, you know, steering the damn car, that'd be great.

[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

I better have both hands on the wheel for all those times I’m mid turn and shift while still moving into reverse……

It’s… for when you’re backing up. You’ve come to a complete stop. You’re going to stop before you start moving forward again. It’s not hard to tilt glasses onto the top of your head while you stop or flip them back down when you stop.

A MUCH bigger issue would be the rear view mirrors which are just cameras and screens.

Are you mixing the two up?

Touch screens in cars are a massive safety issue. I'm not saying they don't have some benefits but the fact that many newer cars have basically no physical buttons to perform basic functions is a problem. I can feel for the dial to adjust the volume or change the radio station. But a touch screen encourages the driver to take their focus off the road. That's a serious problem.

[-] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Wut? I bought a brand new car for €11k three years ago. Right enough the same car is 15k now but still

this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
270 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
341 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS