113
submitted 5 months ago by Owl@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

lmao

(also use Linux)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago

Windows 8.1 was all right if you could tolerate the giant tiles start screen bullshit -- adding multiple desktops was a good move, and brought it up to parity with like 1985-vintage AmigaOS or 2008ish GNOME/Wayland. It performed OK, too, since it threw out all the Aero transparency effects that would burn GPU cycles just sitting on the desktop. Unfortunately, 8 also marked the beginning of breaking up the Control Panel apps into touchscreen-friendly counterparts with missing functionality, and 8.1, 10, and 11 have definitely doubled down on that.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

8 was an UX nightmare.

3 different IEs, 2 different control panels each with different functions. 2 different UI paradigms in the same os for some reason.

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

For you, it was the day that your OS was a UI/UX nightmare. For MiKKKro$oft, it was Tuesday.

this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
113 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23239 readers
332 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS