630

Secret document says Iran security forces molested and killed teen protester (www.bbc.com)

submitted 6 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An Iranian teenager was sexually assaulted and killed by three men working for Iran's security forces, a leaked document understood to have been written by those forces says.

It has let us map what happened to 16-year-old Nika Shakarami who vanished from an anti-regime protest in 2022.

Her body was found nine days later. The government claimed she killed herself.

We put the report's allegations to Iran's government and its Revolutionary Guards. They did not respond.

Marked "Highly Confidential", the report summarises a hearing on Nika's case held by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) - the security force that defends the country's Islamic establishment. It includes what it says are the names of her killers and the senior commanders who tried to hide the truth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

You just pastebinned a generic unresearched islamophobia comment and did not manage to quote the scripture for any of your claim. Good job proving my point.

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Everything I posted is quite literally either part of the Quran or Hadiths. They all are cited too so yeah, I did quote the scripture and you're free to flick through scripture yourself to find them.

The first citations are ones I researched myself to refute your comment, and the others are from a list I saved a while back of the lovely... poetry of the Quran.

I'm very sorry they make Islam look bad. Take it up with the authors.

.. Oh wait

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Weird the Hadith is the scripture? You must be an expert.

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Uhh, yes? The hadiths are in fact part of Islamic scripture. Some considered more trustworthy than others, but they are all Islamic scripture in some form. I believe this specific Hadith I quoted for the initial point is considered "Sahih" (essentially, trustworthy).

And wow. The only response you have to me is to argue the semantics of "scripture"? What's next? Certain parts of the Quran don't count either? Because I posted a lot of Quran verses.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I can see you lack basic reading comprehension because none if the verses you quoted support what you are saying.

Did you even read what you posted by the way? I hope you did not write it yourself because else your interpretations are very... Special.

"Murder of those who question Islam and decide it's wrong:

"Surely those who reject Our signs, We will cast them into the Fire. Whenever their skin is burnt completely, We will replace it so they will ˹constantly˺ taste the punishment. Indeed, Allah is Almighty, All-Wise.""

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

Lmao the mental gymnastics coming from you are absolutely ridiculous.

I'm sorry, what do you consider "casting people into the fire" because they "reject our signs"? If not an endorsement of murder of disbelievers!?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Whenever their skin is burnt completely, We will replace it so they will ˹constantly˺ taste the punishment. Indeed,

Has anyone told you about the concept of hell yet?

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024

630 points (96.9% liked)

World News

38936 readers

2305 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.