140
submitted 6 months ago by HowRu68@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Egyptian and US mediators have reported signs of compromise in recent days and Egyptian state news channel Al-Qahera said on Saturday that a consensus had been reached in the indirect talks over many of the disputed points but gave no further details. However, many analysts remain pessimistic after five months of stop-start talks that have frequently broken down

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Palestinian_legislative_election

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas

Short answer, it's complicated because the last time Palestine had an election this is who the Palestinian people voted for. But there also hasn't been an election like that in a very long time

Also, Israel and the US didn't like their choice, hence the PA which is considered highly corrupt and propped up by Israel and the US.

So for better or Elmore, Hamas is who the Palestinian people voted for (at one point). Their designation as a terrorist organization is largely a western government thing. The UN does not recognize Hamas as a terrorist organization.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

This is true, but it seems to me like an Italy in WW2 kind of situation (sorry for all the WW2 parallels, folks) where a government was voted in but overstayed its welcome, to put it mildly.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

You are projecting how you'd like to interpret things into a situation where the facts on the ground simply don't agree with you.

Hamas has around 90% approval in Gaza:

https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-palestinians-opinion-poll-wartime-views-a0baade915619cd070b5393844bc4514

I agree with the sentiment and would love to see free and fair democratic elections in Palestine. But if public sentiment if the governed is what we're going by, then both the Republican and Democratic party in the US are less legitimate than Hamas. Weird metaphor but there it is. If elections were tomorrow, Hamas would win in a landslide. It's part of the reason why Israel and the US have prevented elections for as long as they have.

[-] betheydocrime@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Hamas has around 90% approval in Gaza:

https://apnews.com/article/israel-hamas-palestinians-opinion-poll-wartime-views-a0baade915619cd070b5393844bc4514

I'm sorry, but that's not what the article says. 90% of respondents think Abbas should resign, but that is separate from "approval". FTA:

Despite the devastation, 57% of respondents in Gaza and 82% in the West Bank believe Hamas was correct in launching the October attack, the poll indicated. A large majority believed Hamas’ claims that it acted to defend a major Islamic shrine in Jerusalem against Jewish extremists and win the release of Palestinian prisoners. Only 10% said they believed Hamas has committed war crimes, with a large majority saying they did not see videos showing the militants committing atrocities.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Sorry about that, you are correct.

Regardless, the article does show significant support for Hamas among the Palestinian people.

The Palestinian people are faced with the option of a corrupt puppet government obviously controlled by Israel and the US, or an extreme, basically terrorist but at least they'll fight for you Hamas.

if your goal is survival who do you pick?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Regardless, the article does show significant support for Hamas among the Palestinian people.

Do you think there might be a good reason for that? Say, their children getting wiped out by the thousands?

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fighting against an Apartheid, truly the most "extreme" people lmao.

Not fighting means you're guaranteed to be fully Genocided and Ethnically Cleansed. As we can see in the West Bank. The only option left for Palestinians is to fight, or roll over and die.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Can we really trust those figures? I'm sure the Kims in the DPRK enjoy very high "approval ratings" too. What is the cost of saying you disapprove?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah you should probably trust those figures instead of rolling with your own head cannon of what you want things to be. I don't see anything in the methods that are particularly suspect, do you?

You need to be open to a reality where the Palestinian people support Hamas because historically, they have. It also shows in polling. Keep in mind the fact that there haven't been elections in Palestine for as long as there have , is part of a strategy by Israel and the US to delegitimize Hamas.

Like, think about your sentiment for a moment. Your basically arguing that Palestine picked wrong and the occupying, colonial settler project know better who should lead the Palestineian people than the Palestinian people.

You are either in favor of democracy, and you work with whom people elect because that's how it works, or you are against democracy. You can't really have it both ways.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

The people they picked don't even live there and do little but embezzle funds... Of course they picked "wrong". I am in favor of democracy and I don't think what's happening now in Gaza is democratic at all.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I am in favor of democracy

Unless the people pick wrong.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

If you genuinely believe that a group voted in 18 years ago who don't live in the country and haven't held an election since then can be considered a legitimate government, we're never going to see eye to eye on this.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

And who is stopping the Palestineian people from holding another election?

Like you don't seem to notice how deep in the paint you are regarding both US and Israelli propaganda on this issue.

this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
140 points (94.3% liked)

World News

38943 readers
2128 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS