211
submitted 6 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

A former Hamilton police officer will not go to jail for sexually assaulting the woman he was mentoring as she pursued her own career in policing.

Michael LaCombe, 54, will instead serve 12 months of house arrest followed by 12 months of probation after Justice Cameron Watson found him guilty of two counts of sexual assault in January, following a trial.

Watson sentenced LaCombe on Monday at the Ontario Court of Justice in St. Catharines, Ont., describing his crimes and the aftermath as "a spectacular and cataclysmic fall from grace" in his written decision.

"His life has taken an irreparable downward spiral. He is no longer the man he once was," Watson wrote.

Watson also described how LaCombe's conduct "devastated" the victim, who has felt isolated and suffers from panic attacks, among other impacts, in recent years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 129 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"His life has taken an irreparable downward spiral. He is no longer the man he once was," Watson wrote.

That is not a valid reason to allow a rapist to escape jail time.

ACAB

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sexual assault, yes. Rape, no.

He removed her shirt and bra and kissed her without consent. No intercourse (including the standard variants thereof) occurred. She protested, and he drove her home.

That's basic sexual assault based on the legal definitions (there are two higher definitions for using weapons or causing bodily harm) and there is no legal minimum for basic sexual assault (of an adult)

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 6 points 6 months ago
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 months ago

He attempted to have an affair. The fact that he stopped when she protested and drove her home instead indicates he didn't attempt or intend to rape her. He still absolutely committed sexual assault though which is why he was found guilty. Consent for any sort of sexual encounter needs to come first, not during or after, and removing someone's shirt and bra definitely requires consent.

When dealing with situations like this, it's important to be very clear and precise. There's unfortunately a lot of actual rapes that occur, and they shouldn't be muddied by situations where someone calls rape when it isn't leading to people downplaying real rapes.

It's the same reason I don't like seeing people put on the sex offender list for public urination just because it happened near a school (even if there were no youth there at the time) or like the case of a man that got put on the list just a couple years ago for writing a short sexual story (completely fictional) simply because it contained teenagers who weren't 18 yet.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca -4 points 6 months ago

Later that month, LaCombe "contrived another opportunity to meet" and picked the victim up in his own car, without initially telling her where they were going, and brought her to a hotel, Paquette said.

He kidnapped her and took her to a hotel room.

In the room, he handed her a dress he bought from Value Village, and she went into the washroom but didn't change into it, the defence said. When she emerged, LaCombe picked her up without her consent, pulled her on top of him, took off her top and bra and kissed her.

Then he wants her to dress up for him AGAINST HER WILL.

[-] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 months ago

What you do is dangerous and can be harmfull for victims. With blowing up the severity of cases like this, you reduce the the severity of kidnapping and rape cases in the minds of people reading your claims.

She wasn't beaten up and dragged into his car, that's what i imagine when i think of kidnapping and it should stay that way.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Taking someone to a place under false pretenses. Then telling her to change into clothes that she didn't want to wear. Then sexually assaulting her.

That definitely sounds like kidnapping and attempted rape to me. Just because she was let go doesn't mean that it wasn't a crime.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He used his authority and position in the community to sexually exploit someone who was vulnerable and IN HIS FUCKING CARE BECAUSE THEY WERE A VULNERABLE PERSON. You're being such an asshole right now, how can you not understand that.

When there is a power dynamic, what might in another context be a simple conflict between two equal people completely changes in nature.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

7226 readers
520 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS