350
submitted 6 months ago by streetfestival@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15001340

"Such an invasion could lead to horrific massacres and raise scenarios of a second Nakba," the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights said recently. "After 200 days of horrific genocidal acts in Gaza, the real objectives of the attack are the continuation of the 76-year-long ongoing Nakba and the erasure and genocidal destruction of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Israel is laying the groundwork to fulfill its settler-colonial plan of colonizing Gaza."

Human rights defenders have warned that Israel may ultimately seek to ethnically cleanse as many Palestinians as possible from Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Just making sure I understand this correctly.

What you are saying is its ok for a news organization to push one side of a story, report only stories that support their views, use language that makes it seem more urgent and serious than it actually is, and this is a reputable organization that should be listed to?

And what the other poster is saying is that this is especially acceptable as its the side they agree with?

And this is ok?

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What you are saying is its ok for a news organization to push one side of a story, report only stories that support their views, use language that makes it seem more urgent and serious than it actually is, and this is a reputable organization that should be listed to?

To a greater or lesser degree, all news orgs do this.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, most organizations lean one way or another.

The issue I've got is that this discussion seems to be saying that it should be celebrated as the be all and end all of this conflict, that you should only be looking at organizations that support your view, and that you shouldn't look into what bias your organizations is pushing without further analysis and understanding.

Effectively, that it's more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Effectively, that it’s more important your views are confirmed than you are informed and accurate.

Who is saying that though? I’m certainly not.

this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
350 points (91.5% liked)

World News

39129 readers
890 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS