791

The theory is simple: instead of buying a household item or a piece of clothing or some equipment you might use once or twice, you take it out and return it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 81 points 6 months ago

With the size of housing units they build in condo buildings these days, who the fuck has any room to store appliances?

Plus, we live in an era where we produce too much shit anyway and it's damaging the environment. So by sharing stuff like this, it means we need to produce less.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Indeed, also it's much nicer to use a shared high quality tool than to buy an el-cheapo disposable tool.

Even something simple like a crowbar. I once borrowed a (shorter) professional crowbar after struggling with a (larger) cheap one. The thing I was trying to pry came out like butter.

Even though physics dictates that a shorter lever should be inferior, it just had a much better design and grip.

Better for our wallet, sanity and environment.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 6 months ago

Yeah but was it any good for killing head crabs?

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 6 months ago

This is an outstanding idea for an apartment community. It addresses space issues, cost concerns, and largely prevents abuse from the get-go because you know where all your borrowers live.

[-] Magister@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

In great Montreal area it's more and more enormous, condo 1000sqft+, thousands of them, that people cannot buy because they are too expensive, I don't understand the system

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah they built these big ass luxury condo towers downtown and most of them are empty. I know because I can see in them from my office building.

Some argue this allows richer people to move out of smaller units therefore freeing them for others. But instead you have international investors coming in to buy them up as a real tax haven. Or the rich will simply buy them but keep the old ones and rent them at a premium. It doesn't help at all.

[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

You don't have a tax for owning "abandoned" housing (inhabited by noone)? There should be.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

There's a tax for foreign ownership now,I think..

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

*cough* Maestria *cough*

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
791 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
4435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS