809
submitted 6 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 88 points 6 months ago

When does this raise questions of precedent? Is everyone entitled to 10 violations of a gag order in NYC now?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 63 points 6 months ago

Yes, if they can pay the $10,000 fine.

The judge said everyone gets warnings and fines before jail time. If he could, he'd issue a large fine, but he can't because state law caps the fine at $1,000 per violation. The judge acknowledged that a $10,000 fine for a multi-millionaire isn't even a punishment, but immediately jailing someone because they can easily afford the fine seemed wrong. Trump violated the gag order 10 times before being officially told to stop, so the judge is lumping them all into a "first" violation. He said the "second" violation absolutely will be punished with jail time. We'll see.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

Bullshit fixed-value fines are only a deterrent for poors.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 6 months ago

As is intended

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

Fines not tied to income are a joke

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

IMO It's not always that simple. Yes some countries do this but it can also backfire (and has). Some examples:

  • unfairly targeting rich people in order to help the town budget

  • previous annual incomes may be vastly different from current monthly wages (furloughed etc.)

  • punishment being spun as a political tool similar to trump's martyrs

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Wow first bullet is a fascinating point, seems obvious now. Great insight!

[-] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

...but immediately jailing someone because they can easily afford the fine seemed wrong.

No it doesn't, not even a little bit! Restrictions on their time are the only things rich people understand; they should be jailed instead of fined early and often.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

And then they get the case cancelled because it's clearly bias against them that they don't get to just pay the same fee as anyone else as a first warning.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Lol...that's not how it works. You don't get a case cancelled for the judge holding someone in contempt...

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You do if it's Trump and he uses it to question the judge's neutrality.

How long do you think before they replace the judge and get things started again? If you believe it won't be long enough to get him elected then I've got a bridge to sell you.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago

This is the second time in this criminal trial (all previous ones have been civil trials), and this me the judge stated that fines are clearly not working and that jail time could be necessary if it keeps happening.

Yes I knew we'll all believe it when it happens, but it is different now that he's in criminal court and the maximum fine has been dealt both for the first and second infringement.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago

Only if you can afford $10k/hr

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Sounds like a small fraction of what Stormy should’ve charged

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
809 points (98.2% liked)

News

23301 readers
1170 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS