111
submitted 8 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

The Judge is being very careful not to give Trump’s team the ability to have the judgement thrown out on appeal.

It's going to be anyway. And if Trump gets another Trump-friendly panel of judges, they're going to find a reason to throw the appeal out no matter what. I very seriously doubt "the defendant was jailed after violating a gag order and making threats against members of the court almost a dozen times" is going to be grounds for a mistrial in any courtroom that didn't have their minds made up already.

There’s also the consideration of when you jail a former President of The United States you then have to make accommodation for their Secret Service detail, which would preclude incarceration in anything but a private facility.

Then the Secret Service should have been making contingency plans for this scenario the second charges were announced. I understand they have a job to do and all that, but they're also human beings with functioning brains. They should have damn well known that the chances of Trump being jailed are very real, and should have known that Trump isn't going to abide by any court rulings if jail as a consequence is off the table. If the Secret Service hasn't already figured out what they'll do if Trump is jailed, then the Secret Service should be the ones with some explaining to do, because Secret Service protection shouldn't mean that the person being protected gets to do whatever they want without consequence.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
111 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19308 readers
1141 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS