599
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

User should have the right to delete their data stored by the company.

[-] flux@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Would that kind of provision allow me to have my code removed from a git repository history, if that git repository is hosted by a company?

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

As long as you didn't give those rights by signing a CLA or a copyleft license. Never sign a CLA unless you're fully compensated.

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am not a lawyer, but I believe in general, yes.

Git is not even that convoluted, as all the history is stored in the .git folder within the repo. Unless there is some convoluted structure built on top, they would only need to move the repo folder to a trash disk, waiting to be formated.

That being said, GDPR is somewhat poorly enforced at the moment, unfortunately. I don't know if you can sue the company and expect some result within couple of years.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

No because user generated content is not protected.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Doesn't that just mean the data would have to be anonymized ?

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I am not a expert or a lawyer, but I believe user actually hold the right to completely erase personal data:

The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay and the controller shall have the obligation to erase personal data without undue delay

https://gdpr.eu/right-to-be-forgotten/

Note the word "erasure" as opposed to "anonymize"

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I don't think that addresses my point. Is my opinion on the new Star Wars movies that I post online or some lines of code I suggest "personal data"? I thought personal data had a specific definition under GDPR

[-] nefonous@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You're totally right, the content of your posts is not considered personal data (because it isn't) It's more about profiling data that can be connected back to your actual person

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I think you are right, user generated content doesn't seem to be protected. This is surprising to me, as user should hold the right to their content, which in my mind should enjoy stronger protection than personal data.

[-] Spaenny@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Technically, they could retain posts from users if they are irreversibly anonymized. However, ensuring with 100% certainty that none of your posts ever contained any personal data that could lead to the identification of you as an individual is challenging. The safest option is therefore to also delete your posts.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That only applies to personal data.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
599 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

37997 readers
236 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS