976
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
976 points (98.4% liked)
Comic Strips
20496 readers
426 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Is this a new thing that people include a CC anti AI license in their posts and comments? Would be pretty cool if it could be integrated in a smoother way as like a post property.
Yes, it's the new "I do not consent to Facebook using my data".
Not too be confused with copyleft and wtfpl.
Dear astroturfers, are we going to do this each and every day?
It's already been talked to death.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Yes, every single person on Lemmy has read that post.
Good. Then it doesn't need to be discussed anymore elsewhere.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Yeah, I've blown pass accepting sarcasm, and gone straight to not taking other people's crap anymore.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
That still doesn't help, dude its annoying af and what the original commenter said is right. No actual bot will give a shit if you add a link pretending your comment has any weight.
Feel free to block me.
/disagree
ProPublica seems to disagree with you.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Your link had nothing to do with ProPublica, and you're right. Thank you, you add nothing to the discussion usually anyway, except the horrendous long and customized blue link. Thank you for the simple solution.
That's not true.
And this is the Creative Commons license they are using, per the Lemmy post summary: Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
... as discussed here ...
https://www.propublica.org/article/how-you-or-your-newsroom-can-republish-propublicas-stories-515
... and here ...
https://www.propublica.org/nerds/happy-birthday-creative-commons
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
"Someone else did it so it must work"
lol
Well, if its ok/works for ProPublica, then that's enough for me. 🤷
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
That's a big "if" on if it works. So wouldn't go around saying it works. Just that someone else is doing it too.
Oh I'm using English properly, in the way I phrased it.
And if they, and their lawyers, believe it works, that's good enough for me.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Did their lawyers really advice them to put it there believing it works?
I wasn't in the room with them, but IMO it would be malpractice of the lawyers if they didn't, so I'm going to assume yes, they did.
It definitely empowers them to go after anyone who uses their content outside of the license.
And it doesn't hurt to have it there. There's nothing wrong with protecting your rights, ever.
Finally, let's not derail the OP post any more than already has been done. If you wish to continue the discussion, it should be done over here...
https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
But you know they advised it?
Are you expecting me to have been in the room with them when they discussed it?
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
I don't know how you'd know. That's why I'm asking.
Here's a comment saying it's useless from a different thread linked by a parallel comment: https://lemmy.world/comment/9817207
The thing is, I'm licensing each one of my comments, so each comment needs to have it displayed and readable via link.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Oh nvm it actually looks nice on desktop, Thunder (mobile client) just displays it in a weird way that shows the custom text and the full URL.
There's an outstanding issue with mobile / phone clients where they're not supporting subscript and superscript fonts correctly. (I use the Lemmy.World's web client.)
You should contact the Thunder client devs and ask them to fix that. You can pass on to them this link which is Lemmy.World's instructions on how to format text.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Hey, I'd like to license your comment, how much?