297

Sad, but rule (pawb.social)

submitted 5 months ago by knightly@pawb.social to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

You seem knowledgeable enough about the topic to realize that it’s not as cut-and-dry as you’re making it out to be.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

In what way?

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Elections are massively complicated and a single strategy doesn’t determine who wins and loses. You and the other commenter could both be right (or wrong), depending on the context or circumstances.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Sure, there could be some specific cases where they're correct. But if you can't say anything about elections unless it's generalizable to all circumstances, then you can't say anything about elections at all. I'm speaking generally.