493
jackpot (programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

So we do all realize that advertised jackpots are annuitized amounts and that the vast majority take the net present value lump sum, which is usually about half the advertised amount, right?

Winner probably got about six hundred million, of which roughly forty percent was taken for taxes give or take state income tax rates.

[-] nogooduser@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Not being from the US I didn’t know that. That takes something from being completely unreasonable to be understandable.

I can’t believe some fake rich guy on the internet lied to us!

Still, if they’re not idiots the winner doesn’t have to work again so they’re still good.

[-] 4ce@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That takes something from being completely unreasonable to be understandable.

Why would taxing a gross income of above a billion US$ by ~66% be "completely unreasonable"? Imo taxes for such incomes should generally be higher if anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
493 points (91.7% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
936 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS