297
Sad, but rule (pawb.social)
submitted 5 months ago by knightly@pawb.social to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

but that should pave the way for a candidate on the left that people actually want

Candidates don't emerge for voters that don't vote. Because in the analysis they don't even exist, because they don't vote. It's a null data set. No politician is going to gamble on it possibly maybe existing but don't vote. No donors are going to donate to causes which the voters maybe possibly exist but don't vote. It simply doesn't happen.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Nobody here is talking about people that never vote.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

New to Lemmy? There are hordes of users (no exaggeration) that say they won't vote because the Dems aren't left enough and bothsidessame.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I’ll take your word for it. I’m only talking about people in my situation. We’ve voted in the past and aren’t voting now. Presidents have won by focusing on getting out the vote for populations that have had low voter turnout.

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
297 points (99.7% liked)

196

16401 readers
2277 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS