794
submitted 6 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

No. So many people misunderstand that. No, it does not simply mean you automatically sacrifice longterm profits. Fiduciary responsibility is pretty widely open to interpretation because shareholders overall can want different things. Some stocks barely budge in price but the board gives good dividends. Some companies make no profit for years upon years because they are pushing for growth. Just chalking this up to fiduciary responsibility is misguided and misses many big reasons why many boards choose short term profits while sacrificing longterm sustainability. Many get most of their earnings in stock. As long as they can keep the share price up long enough for them to make bank, they have little care about the longterm health of the company. This is one of the reasons that stock buybacks have been so big over the last decade.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Then other companies do stock buybacks instead of quality control in their airplane factories...

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

The Lich the holds Jack Welch’s phylactery demands sacrifices.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

Well, ackchyually… /s

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
794 points (98.9% liked)

World News

32352 readers
410 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS