260
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Jesus Christ he's actually trying to lose this election.

[-] hark@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

I remember when trump was called out on his dumb little trade war (and rightfully so), but now that biden took the same trade war and escalated it, somehow it's all good. Then these hypocrites wonder why people think both parties are the same.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Ah yes.... Scotch tariffs really helped save our domestic Scotch market.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Saying both parties are the same is an early sign of dementia.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

It's always fascinating to watch liberals attempting to distance themselves from their more overtly fascist cousins... yeah - totally nothing suspicious going on there.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago

No, you’re just scared to face the reality that you actually have no power in this country, and the both sides are in fact the same. One just says the N word.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Anyone who thinks both sides are the same is head caved in stupid, not paying attention, or willfully lying.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I would vote for a presidency that is for free trade. Allow these companies to mature in the market. Though in this case the technology in US cars is extremely behind. I mean were only just getting LFP in cars, and while 800v that allows for super fast charging is markedly common over there, it is in only a few models here. I'm not getting why we're putting these companies under tariff, legacy doesn't have an EV industry with the capacity to scale affordable EV. A lack of innovation is also something to mention. It really shouldn't be considered a good thing when a 10 year old EV like the Bolt is a best seller. I wish the US legacy auto EV industry would either build a very basic aerodynamic economy EV with no tech nonsense for under 25k with 250 miles minimum or just leave it to Tesla and Chinese OEM. I mean all of them have abandoned the sedan and economy car market.. Why not let the Chinese have that market share if they can't build something comparable just put tariffs on Chinese SUV and trucks which is a segment that legacy auto can't stop building.

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
260 points (96.8% liked)

News

36711 readers
1213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS